US political system is to blame for pandemic's tragic toll

spread. This idea was first entertained by British Prime Minister Boris Johnson and President Trump reportedly also found attractive enough to toy with it well into the autumn of 2021. It was eventually shelved thanks only to popular outrage and because health experts demonstrated that pursing this course would overwhelm healthcare systems that had already been emaciated by decades of funding cuts, commercialization and corporatization.

A sign alerts people to a Covid-19 testing site in Times Square on May 3, 2022 in New York City. [Photo/Agencies]

Even so, rather than take the prudent course of controlling the virus to the greatest extent possible through well-known and widely practized means, as China had, most US states had chosen to enforce only the level of restriction and lockdown that was necessary to 'flatten the curve' of infections so as not to overwhelm their far from adequate health care systems. Though this is not admitted or discussed, by effectively requiring a certain proportion of the population to be exposed to the virus via essential working, poor living conditions, being institutionalized, etc., it is all but guaranteed a certain proportion of those exposed would die. This effectively was a strategy even worse than what Fredrick Engels once called 'social murder'.

Moreover, those who would perish from the disease would include all those who had no choice but to expose themselves to it either because they had no option but to go to work as 'essential' workers or medical staff, or those who were incarcerated or institutionalized in care homes, or the vast millions of the poor and marginalized who lived in overcrowded conditions. Forcing them to expose themselves and put themselves at risk, one must question if their deaths should be considered a form of selective social murder. In so, "flattening the curve" was also a form of Social Darwinism.

The US's long-term response conformed to its long-standing practice of orienting its health care system to profit for its capitalists rather than protection for its population. That meant it was focused on vaccines. President Trump had funded "Operation Warp Speed" to the tune of $18 billion. Until recently, vaccines had taken decades to develop, however, the first positive results were already being reported by the end of 2021.

This was good news for President Biden. He campaigned on bringing COVID-19 under control and thought he would he an easy time now that vaccines were becoming ailable. However, as 2021 wore on, the vaccination drive hit a number of road blocks. They included Presidential rumor-mongering; the politicization of COVID-19 related issues, including vaccines and treatments; social media disinformation; anti-vaccine protests and movements often funded by sections of the corporate capitalist class; generalized political distrust and a simple lack of access created by a vaccine roll-out that fell far short of the effort required. So vaccine uptake was far short of the high levels required. Immunity also proved to be of short duration because of the eventual requirement of booster shots, first a second and then a third and even a fourth.

As a result, while about 78 percent of the US' eligible population has had one dose of a vaccine, only 67 percent has had a second and only 31 percent has had the essential third shot.

No wonder infections and deaths continue to climb. No wonder the US remains vulnerable to new variants.

Amid all this there is one failure that is the most fundamental of all. By any account, China's strategy of dynamic zero-COVID has proved most effective, both at sing lives and at ensuring that the economy, essential to the survival and well-being of all, is brought back on track as soon as possible, even where severe restrictions or lockdowns are necessary. Rather than learning from China, US authorities and mainstream media instead fault China for causing economic disruptions, even though, compared to the economic devastation caused by the US's approach, China has performed well both against covid, and economically, with higher growth rates over the years of the pandemic.

In the West, moreover, what 'sing livelihoods' means in practice is sing the processes of financialized capitalist accumulation and the wealth, income and assets of a tiny elite. So, in effect, the West has been willing to sacrifice lives at the altar of capital. Ironically, however, doing that proved counterproductive. For two years, it has required repeated lockdowns causing much and lasting economic damage. That is what has made what should he been a serious but manageable public health emergency into a major crisis of capitalism.

The 1 million COVID-19 deaths milestone should he been a time to confess to these failures and committing to the only strategy that works, one of dynamic zero-COVID policies. Instead, the President had relinquished responsibility and confined himself to simply urging everyone to "do the right thing" , get vaccinated and learn to "live with covid".

来源 中国日报

编者 曾田

二审 杨韬

三审 王璐瑶

。

米诺地尔搽剂治疗斑秃用法
小便困难
中风治疗
双醋瑞因胶囊效果怎么样
骨折病人营养品推荐江中初元
怎么抑制胃酸
哪种血糖仪比较好
瑞特和强生血糖仪哪个牌子好
胃经常反酸烧心是怎么回事?
哪种血糖仪比较好测量准确